Greg Landsman has raised the most in this race — $5,662,206, ahead of Eric Conroy at $2,372,637. Greg Landsman has taken the most PAC and party-committee money: $1,202,611. On AIPAC: Greg Landsman has taken $1,180,934 in AIPAC-linked contributions; Eric Conroy has an AIPAC-linked record (amount still under verification).
This is a closely divided district where either party can win. Greg Landsman, a Democrat, has taken $1,180,934 in donations linked to AIPAC, the pro-Israel lobbying group. Eric Conroy, a Republican, shows a record of donations linked to AIPAC, but the exact amount is still being confirmed.
Key issues in Ohio
Major issues facing Ohio, based on 2025–2026 reporting. Compare them with what each candidate says they focus on below.
Cost of living and inflation — Inflation and everyday prices dominate voter concerns, with gas topping four dollars amid global tensions.
Data centers and electric bills — A data center boom sparks fights over who pays for grid upgrades as household electric bills climb.
Health care costs — Rising medical and insurance costs rank among voters' top concerns heading into the election.
Threats to democracy — Roughly a quarter of voters name threats to democracy as a decisive issue in this election.
Immigration policy — Immigration divides voters, with a majority calling mass deportations good for the state.
Candidates & funding
Greg Landsman DemocratNominee
AIPAC-linked $1,180,934FundVoter-reported, career 2024–2026 — methodology replication pending
AIPAC PAC and AIPAC-routed contributions, 2024-2026. Source: FEC filings via FundVoter.
No 2026 conduit activity detectedFEC filings show no earmarked contributions via conduits this cycle
2026 fundraising (FEC)$5,662,206 raised · $5,339,370 spent · $502,952 cash on hand through Oct 14, 2026
Focus: Putting OH-01 children and families first; strong, responsible, caring leadership for Southwest Ohio.
FEC campaign finance data through Oct 14, 2026. Campaign dollars, by source.
Greg Landsman D
Eric Conroy R
Raised
$5.7M
$2.4M
Individuals
$3.6M63%
$1M44%
PACs & parties
$1.2M21%
$371K16%
Self-funded
$0
$326K14%
Other
$905K16%
$641K27%
AIPAC-linked*
$1.2M
—
Outside spending†
—
—
* AIPAC-linked money is already counted in the rows above — it flags the pro-Israel share, not extra money.
† Independent spending on ads for or against a candidate. It never goes to their campaign.
“Individuals” covers both small-dollar (under $200) and large donors.
Who are the biggest donors?
Every donor ranked by how much they gave, from the candidate’s own FEC filings — individuals, PACs, and party committees all in one list. Expand a candidate to see theirs, then tap any name to learn more about the donor.
Why are so many gifts exactly $10,000? That’s the legal maximum a PAC can give one candidate for the whole cycle — $5,000 for the primary plus $5,000 for the general — so many PACs give the max. Individuals can give up to $3,500 per election.
Greg Landsman2033 donors
FINANCIAL POSITION
Campaign raised$5.7M
Campaign spent$5.3M
Cash on hand$503K
FEC 2026 through 10/14/2026
CANDIDATE-CONTROLLED MONEY
Individuals63%
PACs / committees21%
Self-funding0%
Share of campaign receipts. FEC 2026.
ROUTED CONTRIBUTIONS
No 2026 conduit activity detected
FEC filings show no earmarked contributions via conduits this cycle. Career AIPAC-linked total (above) may reflect prior cycles. How conduits work →
Individuals gave through these conduits. Conduit is routing layer, not legal donor. General platforms (ActBlue, WinRed) are payment processors, not networks. How conduits work →
Self-funded$53K
Individual$14K
Individual$13K
Individual$11K
PAC$10K
PAC$10K
Corporate PAC$8K
Individual$7K
Individual$7K
Individual$7K
Leadership PAC$7K
Individual$5K
Individual$5K
Joint fundraising committee$5K
Leadership PAC$5K
Leadership PAC$5K
Leadership PAC$5K
Leadership PAC$5K
Leadership PAC$5K
Leadership PAC$5K
Leadership PAC$5K
Leadership PAC$5K
Leadership PAC$5K
Leadership PAC$5K
Leadership PAC$5K
Leadership PAC$5K
Candidate committee$5K
Leadership PAC$5K
Corporate PAC$5K
Leadership PAC$4K
Individual$4K
Individual$4K
Individual$4K
Individual$4K
Individual$4K
Individual$4K
Individual$4K
Individual$4K
Individual$4K
Individual$4K
Individual$4K
Individual$3K
Individual$3K
PAC$3K
Leadership PAC$3K
Individual$3K
Individual$2K
Individual$2K
Individual$2K
Individual$2K
Showing the 50 biggest of 464 donors. The other 414 gave $222K combined.
Plus $289K from small donors giving under $200 each — those aren’t itemized by name.
These figures come from the candidate’s own itemized FEC reports (2026 cycle, through the coverage date above), with amendments applied and refunds netted. Joint fundraising transfers are left out of the ranking: they’re pass-throughs, and the individual donations behind them are listed above. Bank interest, vendor refunds, and other non-donation receipts are excluded. Donor names are as reported — the same person can appear twice if their name was recorded differently. Independent spending on ads is never included here — see the Outside spending column.
Common questions
Who has raised more money in the Ohio District 1 race?
Greg Landsman has raised more: $5,662,206, ahead of Eric Conroy at $2,372,637.
Who takes PAC money in the Ohio District 1 race?
Greg Landsman has taken the most money from PACs and party committees: $1,202,611. Eric Conroy has taken $371,188.
Who takes AIPAC money in the Ohio District 1 race?
Greg Landsman has taken $1,180,934 in AIPAC-linked contributions. Eric Conroy has an AIPAC-linked record in FEC filings; the dollar amount is still under verification.
When is the Ohio District 1 election?
Election Day is Tuesday, November 3, 2026.
Related news
October 23, 2026
Trump-aligned super PACs spend millions defending once-safe Republican House seats
MAGA Inc., Trump's main super PAC, reported $300.5M in disbursements through Oct 14 and still held $164.3M, routing $200M to No Going Back PAC and $25M to Safety & Affordability PAC. Safety & Affordability is defending Republicans in AZ-01, ME-02, WI-03, NC-01, OH-10, PA-08, OH-09 and MI-07; No Going Back has spent ~$5M each in MI-04 and NC-11, $14.4M combined in FL-14 and FL-25, and roughly $79M across the MI, OH, NH and NC Senate races. Meanwhile the Congressional Leadership Fund has stopped advertising in IA-01, NJ-07, MI-08 and OH-01.
Congressional Leadership Fund pulls $10 million from four House races, cutting off Miller-Meeks and Kean
The Congressional Leadership Fund, the GOP's top House super PAC, confirmed Oct. 13 it is pulling about $10 million in ad reservations from four districts: it is ending advertising support for Reps. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (IA-1) and Tom Kean Jr. (NJ-7), and abandoning efforts to unseat Reps. Greg Landsman (OH-1) and Kristen McDonald Rivet (MI-8). A spokesperson said Iowa money will be reallocated to the more competitive IA-2 and IA-3. It is the first time a major national Republican group has abandoned a GOP incumbent this cycle; Trump-aligned super PACs are also diverting money from the Kean and Miller-Meeks races.
GOP triage: Congressional Leadership Fund abandons four House races, redirects into 16 others
The Congressional Leadership Fund, the leading House Republican super PAC, canceled ad spending in four races (Iowa's 1st, New Jersey's 7th, Ohio's 1st and Michigan's 8th) and increased investment in 16 other races from Texas to Pennsylvania. The money being pulled, $13.3 million per the AP's tally, was redirected to defend incumbents including Brian Fitzpatrick, Monica De La Cruz, Rob Wittman and Bill Huizenga, and from Iowa's 1st into the 2nd and 3rd districts. It is the first time this cycle a major national GOP group has abandoned a Republican incumbent. The AP also reported a Trump-allied super PAC cutting back in the Las Vegas-area race (NV-03) and a DCCC $17 million fundraising drive to exploit the openings.
