Mike Turner has raised the most in this race — $1,315,094, ahead of Kristina Knickerbocker at $1,015,878. Mike Turner has taken the most PAC and party-committee money: $604,100. On AIPAC: Mike Turner has taken $228,990 in AIPAC-linked contributions.
This district leans Republican. Mike Turner, a Republican, has taken $228,990 in donations linked to AIPAC, the pro-Israel lobbying group. Kristina Knickerbocker, a Democrat, shows no AIPAC-linked donations in available records.
Key issues in Ohio
Major issues facing Ohio, based on 2025–2026 reporting. Compare them with what each candidate says they focus on below.
Cost of living and inflation — Inflation and everyday prices dominate voter concerns, with gas topping four dollars amid global tensions.
Data centers and electric bills — A data center boom sparks fights over who pays for grid upgrades as household electric bills climb.
Health care costs — Rising medical and insurance costs rank among voters' top concerns heading into the election.
Threats to democracy — Roughly a quarter of voters name threats to democracy as a decisive issue in this election.
Immigration policy — Immigration divides voters, with a majority calling mass deportations good for the state.
Candidates & funding
Mike Turner RepublicanNominee
AIPAC-linked $228,990FundVoter-reported, career 2024–2026 — methodology replication pending
AIPAC PAC and AIPAC-routed contributions, career 2022-2026. Source: FEC filings via FundVoter.
No 2026 conduit activity detectedFEC filings show no earmarked contributions via conduits this cycle
2026 fundraising (FEC)$1,315,094 raised · $1,420,269 spent · $325,250 cash on hand through Oct 14, 2026
FEC campaign finance data through Oct 14, 2026. Campaign dollars, by source.
Mike Turner R
Kristina Knickerbocker D
Raised
$1.3M
$1M
Individuals
$588K45%
$900K89%
PACs & parties
$604K46%
$90K9%
Self-funded
$0
$7K1%
Other
$123K9%
$18K2%
AIPAC-linked*
$229K
—
Outside spending†
—
—
* AIPAC-linked money is already counted in the rows above — it flags the pro-Israel share, not extra money.
† Independent spending on ads for or against a candidate. It never goes to their campaign.
“Individuals” covers both small-dollar (under $200) and large donors.
Who are the biggest donors?
Every donor ranked by how much they gave, from the candidate’s own FEC filings — individuals, PACs, and party committees all in one list. Expand a candidate to see theirs, then tap any name to learn more about the donor.
Why are so many gifts exactly $10,000? That’s the legal maximum a PAC can give one candidate for the whole cycle — $5,000 for the primary plus $5,000 for the general — so many PACs give the max. Individuals can give up to $3,500 per election.
Mike Turner237 donors
FINANCIAL POSITION
Campaign raised$1.3M
Campaign spent$1.4M
Cash on hand$325K
FEC 2026 through 10/14/2026
CANDIDATE-CONTROLLED MONEY
Individuals45%
PACs / committees46%
Self-funding0%
Share of campaign receipts. FEC 2026.
ROUTED CONTRIBUTIONS
No 2026 conduit activity detected
FEC filings show no earmarked contributions via conduits this cycle. Career AIPAC-linked total (above) may reflect prior cycles. How conduits work →
Individual$14K
Individual$14K
Individual$13K
Corporate PAC$10K
Labor PAC$10K
Corporate PAC$10K
Labor PAC$10K
Corporate PAC$10K
Labor PAC$10K
Corporate PAC$10K
PAC$10K
Corporate PAC$10K
Individual$9K
Corporate PAC$8K
Labor PAC$8K
Labor PAC$8K
Corporate PAC$8K
Corporate PAC$8K
PAC$8K
Labor PAC$8K
Individual$7K
Individual$7K
Individual$7K
Individual$7K
Individual$7K
Individual$7K
Individual$7K
Individual$7K
Individual$7K
Individual$7K
Individual$7K
Individual$7K
Individual$7K
PAC$7K
Individual$7K
Individual$6K
Individual$6K
Corporate PAC$6K
Individual$5K
Labor PAC$5K
PAC$5K
Corporate PAC$5K
Corporate PAC$5K
Corporate PAC$5K
Labor PAC$5K
Trade association PAC$5K
Labor PAC$5K
Corporate PAC$5K
Membership PAC$5K
Labor PAC$5K
Showing the 50 biggest of 237 donors. The other 187 gave $369K combined.
Plus $46K from small donors giving under $200 each — those aren’t itemized by name.
These figures come from the candidate’s own itemized FEC reports (2026 cycle, through the coverage date above), with amendments applied and refunds netted. Joint fundraising transfers are left out of the ranking: they’re pass-throughs, and the individual donations behind them are listed above. Bank interest, vendor refunds, and other non-donation receipts are excluded. Donor names are as reported — the same person can appear twice if their name was recorded differently. Independent spending on ads is never included here — see the Outside spending column.
Common questions
Who has raised more money in the Ohio District 10 race?
Mike Turner has raised more: $1,315,094, ahead of Kristina Knickerbocker at $1,015,878.
Who takes PAC money in the Ohio District 10 race?
Mike Turner has taken the most money from PACs and party committees: $604,100. Kristina Knickerbocker has taken $90,500.
Who takes AIPAC money in the Ohio District 10 race?
Mike Turner has taken $228,990 in AIPAC-linked contributions.
When is the Ohio District 10 election?
Election Day is Tuesday, November 3, 2026.
Related news
October 23, 2026
Trump-aligned super PACs spend millions defending once-safe Republican House seats
MAGA Inc., Trump's main super PAC, reported $300.5M in disbursements through Oct 14 and still held $164.3M, routing $200M to No Going Back PAC and $25M to Safety & Affordability PAC. Safety & Affordability is defending Republicans in AZ-01, ME-02, WI-03, NC-01, OH-10, PA-08, OH-09 and MI-07; No Going Back has spent ~$5M each in MI-04 and NC-11, $14.4M combined in FL-14 and FL-25, and roughly $79M across the MI, OH, NH and NC Senate races. Meanwhile the Congressional Leadership Fund has stopped advertising in IA-01, NJ-07, MI-08 and OH-01.
DCCC expands TV reservations into three Trump-won House districts: AZ-02, OH-10, SC-01
The DCCC is adding TV reservations in Arizona's 2nd (Eli Crane vs Jonathan Nez), Ohio's 10th (Mike Turner vs Kristina Knickerbocker), and South Carolina's 1st (Jenny Honeycutt vs Nancy Lacore) as part of a $16 million coordinated TV campaign. The committee is now spending, in coordination with Democratic candidates, in 49 House districts — two-thirds of which are currently held by Republicans.
